Health and safety close outdoor pool because of rain ‘risk”
When you read this sort of thing you think “what the hell?” but imagine watching 70, 80 people in a piece of water 50×16 metres for minimum wage when the minimum of floodlighting or in-pool-lighting has been installed and see how you might feel – and we haven’t even mentioned lightning!
Heavy rain can turn pool water to a foggy, grey blur in seconds and it would be impossible to see someone slip under the water. It is easy to knock these rules but “walk the deck” and watch the tank and see if you want that risk on your hands.
Splendid though it is the real sadness at London Fields is the loss of a deep-end and boards
“For those hardy souls who enjoy an outdoor dip, a little extra water seems unlikely to be a major deterrent.
But the threat of a spot of rain – when combined with the implacable nature of ‘elf and safety regulations – look like succeeding where the cold and the wind have failed.
Swimmers at one outdoor pool have been warned they may be banned from taking a dip whenever the heavens open.
The bizarre measure came to light at the popular London Fields Lido in Hackney, East London, during a brief burst of rain. “
(Via Sorry, it’s too wet for swimming: Health and safety close outdoor pool because of rain ‘risk’ | Mail Online: .)
From Swimclub forum
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa…ety/article.do
I would like to think it’s April 1st but no. Please watch your blood pressure when replying.”
(Via SwimClub.co.uk Forums London Fields Lido elf & safety farce: .)
From Londonist
“
‘Too wet to swim!’ is the accusation that the Standard has slapped on London Fields lido. They’re referring to health & safety measures that, the newspaper claims, direct staff to close the pool in the event of precipitation. A ridiculous notion, one that the ‘London cheerleader‘ makes light of, so it’s lucky that there’s very little truth to it. In actual fact, the story stems from just a single incident, when visitors were told that if already heavy rainfall turned torrential, thus impeding the lifeguard from seeing properly, the pool would be shut. It never came to pass, as the rain shortly stopped. The message here? Bashing our often draconian safety laws may be a good sport, but in our increasingly litigious society, the same bashers would be the first to call the no-win no-fee lawyers if some tragedy occurred because the lifeguard couldn’t see three feet in front of him. (Photo / DanMud)”
(Via Londonist London Fields Lido Scared Of A Little Rain?: .)